Accelerating New Drug Development: The Role of Radioisotope Labeling
In
drug development, Radioisotope labeling has become a powerful tool. It provides
a means to track the fate of drugs in the body and helps researchers to better
understand the metabolic processes and potential toxicity of new compounds. So,
scientists can design more effective and safer drugs, reducing the risk of
adverse effects and increasing the likelihood of success in clinical trials.
Isotopes are atoms of the same chemical
element with different masses due to the presence of different neutron numbers
in the nucleus, and there are light and heavy isotopes; based on physical
properties, isotopes can also be classified into two forms: radioactive and
stable. Radioisotope labeling technology is a very useful tool in the process
of new drug
development, and Medicilon
offers radioisotope services.
Based on physical properties, isotopes can be
classified into two forms: radioactive and stable. Radioactive isotopes (e.g.
3H, 14C) undergo their decay process and radiate radiation energy, are
unstable, and have physical half-life; stable isotopes are non-radioactive,
have stable physical properties, exist in nature in a certain proportion
(abundance), are harmless to the human body, and can be labeled into drug
molecules by chemical synthesis and tracked and detected by instruments such as
gas and liquid quality.
1, The reason why radioisotopes are widely
used.
Radioisotopes are widely used for active
material tracing mainly depending on two most important characteristics:
(1) homogeneity with the material being
traced, i.e., a high degree of consistency in chemical and biological behavior
between the radionuclide and its non-radionuclides of the same element, without
disturbing and disrupting the equilibrium of physiological processes in vivo
and in vitro;
(2) Distinguishability with the traced
material, where the nucleus of the radionuclide continuously decays and emits
rays that can be detected by the radiosonde, thus enabling the quantification
and localization of the marker.
In addition, radioisotope tracer technology
has the advantages of high sensitivity, high specificity, wide applicability,
and simple detection method, so it has been widely used in drug ADME research, and the U.S. FDA has long taken the
pharmacokinetic data of radioisotope labeled drugs after administration as an
important basis for the safety evaluation of new drugs, and has formulated
relevant guidelines.
2, The direction of radioisotopes in drug
development
In terms of quantitative sensitivity,
radioisotope-labeled compounds are more sensitive than stable isotope markers,
and the measurement of radioactivity is not affected by non-radioactive
impurities and chemical states, thus making quantitative analysis easier and
the results more accurate. In addition to solving analytical problems that
cannot be solved by conventional analytical methods, radioisotope-labeled
compounds can more importantly be used as tracers to study the distribution,
metabolism, efficacy, and mechanism of action of drugs in vivo, providing an
important basis for the pharmacokinetic study of drugs, and providing methods
for the development of innovative drugs.
3, Choice of radioisotope labeling position
Before the preparation of labeled drugs, the
first step is to select the appropriate isotope as the labeling element and
decide on the labeling position. The labeled drug used for tracer study should
make the labeled atoms represent the whole molecule of the drug in the organism
as much as possible and should pay attention to the possible changes of the
drug in the body. The structure of the drug molecule, the half-life of the
isotope, the energy of the radiation, the ease of introducing the labeled atom,
and the special requirements of the tracer test should be taken into account
when choosing the isotope to be used as the labeled atom. The most commonly
used isotopes are 14C, 3H, and 35S; sometimes 32P and 131I are also used.
As the most commonly used radionuclide, 14C is
usually labeled on the skeleton structure of molecules, and its labeling sites
are more stable; 3H is prone to exchange with 1H in the surrounding
environment, resulting in a decrease in a specific activity, so it is less
stable than 14C; in addition, 3H has a more obvious isotope effect compared
with 14C, which also limits its application to some extent. However, in
general, in tracer experiments, the errors caused by isotopic effects are often
within the experimental allowable errors and can be neglected. In addition,
considering that the synthesis of 3H markers is relatively simple, 3H markers
are also often chosen as tracers when they can meet the experimental
requirements.
In addition to the above, computer-assisted
metabolite prediction (CAMP) techniques can be used in the selection of labeling
sites to predict stable sites in the molecular structure of compounds. In
general, labeling of C atoms on aromatic or alicyclic rings in the molecular
structure should be considered first, while labeling at active sites such as
carboxyl, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl, amino, and imino groups should be avoided as
much as possible. This is because once these unstable groups are separated from
the parent compound, the ability to trace the parent drug and major metabolites
is lost. In addition, the labeling site should be far away from the chemical
bond-break location to avoid the effect of isotope effect. If the parent
compound generates 2 important metabolites simultaneously due to chemical bond
breakage during metabolism, a dual-labeling technique can be considered for
parent compound labeling.
Medicilon offers radioisotope analysis
services for labeling experiments in the drug development process using
radioisotopes such as 3H, 14C, 32P, 33P, 125I, and 35S.
Comments
Post a Comment