What are the business models of pharmaceutical R&D outsourcing organizations?
Pharmaceutical R&D outsourcing CRO refers to pharmaceutical companies using the purchase of new drug clinical or preclinical research and other services from a third party, and the contractor is responsible for the work tasks of drug development trials and declaration of registration within the scope of the contract, mainly serving the stage of new drug launch and before.
The pressure of new drug R&D has led to the rise of new drug R&D outsourcing services and has also driven the global CRO industry to take off. Consistency evaluation of generic drugs, self-checking and verification of drug clinical trials, and acceleration of drug trials are driving the domestic CRO market to the 100 billion level.
The
current high cost of pharmaceutical R&D, the reduced success rate of
R&D, and massive patent expiration have prompted pharmaceutical companies
to be more eager to improve the efficiency and speed of R&D, which has
accelerated the development of the specialized division of labor, accelerated
the increase of CRO penetration rate and accelerated the development of CRO
industry. As a CRO company, Medicilon Biopharma is a comprehensive technical
service platform in China that integrates compound synthesis, compound activity
screening, structural biology, pharmacodynamic evaluation, pharmacogenetic
evaluation, and toxicological evaluation in line with international standards.
CRO
exists in four business models currently.
1,
the traditional model: refers to the transaction between CRO enterprises and
pharmaceutical companies for one-time marketing of the preliminary order
contract model, That is, the "one hand to pay, one hand to deliver"
model. Due to the lack of R&D strength and poor risk tolerance, most CRO
companies adopt the traditional model in the early establishment stage. Under
this business model, CRO companies take low risks and have low returns.
2,
Innovative model: A model in which pharmaceutical companies pay CROs a
proportional amount according to their progress. An innovative business model
requires pharmaceutical companies and CRO companies to set "milestones
jointly," After each "milestone," pharmaceutical companies will
pay CRO companies a certain amount of service fees.
3,
Results-oriented model: CRO companies can get an excess bonus if they complete
the project, and the revenue will be reduced if the project is delayed. Under
the result-oriented model, CRO and pharmaceutical companies share certain risks
and benefits. Pharmaceutical companies will have more patent terms and increase
revenue if the project is completed early. Cros will get more project revenue,
and vice versa.
4, Risk-sharing
model: The pharmaceutical companies will hand over the project to CRO
enterprises, and the latter will be responsible for the design and
implementation of the project. Under the risk-sharing model, CRO companies
share the risks and benefits with pharmaceutical companies, and CRO companies
take the initiative to take risks and share more returns. Under the new
risk-sharing model, CROs can participate more deeply in new drug R&D
projects, share the risks with pharmaceutical companies, and get more lucrative
returns.
Currently,
CROs in the domestic market is divided into three levels of the ladder. The
strongest at the top are the domestic branches of large multinational CROs,
with muscular R&D strength and financial strength, which can carry out international
multi-center trials; followed by large local CROs, represented by Medicilon,
WuXi AppTec, Tigermed, Boji, etc., which are familiar with the domestic market
and can provide most preclinical and clinical trial They are familiar with the
domestic market and can provide most of the preclinical and clinical trial
services; the most significant number and the lowest barrier to entry are small
and medium-sized local CROs, which are of mixed quality, many of which mainly
provide low-technology-intensive work such as registration filing, with poor
profitability and easy to fall into the disorderly competition, but CROs with
the standardized operation will survive and grow in the fierce competition.
Comments
Post a Comment